Announcement

Collapse

Disclaimer - Read This First

Disclaimer

This website contains general information about medical and educational conditions and treatments. The information is not advice, and should not be treated as such.

The educational and medical information on this website is provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied. Cheryl Swope, M.Ed. and Memoria Press make no representations or warranties in relation to the information on this website.

You must not rely on the information on this website as an alternative to medical advice from your doctor or individualized advice from any other professional healthcare or educational provider. If you think you or your child may be suffering from any medical condition you should seek immediate medical attention.

You should never delay seeking medical or educational advice, disregard medical or educational advice, or discontinue medical or educational treatment because of any information on this website.
See more
See less

Concern with Rhetoric

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Concern with Rhetoric

    Hello!

    My son on the spectrum is working through Refutation/Confirmation this year for Composition. He is having a hard time with the concept of this level--taking a story and refuting it (pointing out all that is wrong with the arguments, narrative consistency, etc) and then turning around and doing the opposite (confirming all the arguments, etc). This is strange to him, having to view the story from opposite perspectives. It feels wrong not to try to find the truth (does this story make sense or not?) but rather to practice rhetorical devices. Why not just study Logic and then apply it to this story? Why not only refute or confirm each story? .

    He is going with the assignments, although we are still on Lesson 1 after 6 weeks, but he is worried about how it might affect him. He wonders will he be tempted to use rhetoric to twist his siblings' arguments around? I had to smile at that, but he is so scrupulously careful that it really is bothering him.

    I have explained the value of this level as best I can. It is important to learn these rhetorical techniques so that you can recognize them in your reading of the news, politics, or when others may try to use them on you. It is also simply good writing practice.

    He is a black and white thinker. I think these exercises are great tools to expand his understanding of others' perspectives. But I would love some advice on how to explain their value to him.

    Thank you!
    Catherine

    2018-19
    DS15, 9th
    DS13, 6th
    DS11, 5th
    DD11, 5th
    DS6, K
    DD3
    DS 10 mos

    Homeschooling 3 with MP
    2 using First Form series in school

    #2
    Re: Concern with Rhetoric

    Catherine, this is a great question. It reflects not only his challenges in mental flexibility but also, and more importantly, your good work in raising him to love and defend what is true!

    You might try this so as to not trouble his conscience:

    1. He defends a position to the best of his ability.
    2. He then defends the opposing position as strongly and clearly as someone who believed that way would defend that position.
    3. When he finishes the rhetorical exercise, he then tells you (and himself) which is objectively true. Though not part of the rhetorical exercise, you can add this moral exercise to ease his conscience and assure him that we uphold truth no matter how well someone is able to defend it!

    To explain the value of this practice, you can be honest: He will encounter intelligent, albeit errant, thinkers in his young adulthood. He needs to know how they think! It will be an exercise in thinking like those who oppose truth would think. You can tell him that you would not ask a child to do this. He is only being asked to do this because he has the knowledge and maturity to do so. You can assure him you will help. You might listen to newscasts or podcasts you would not normally listen to, just to get his feet wet. What arguments do they make? Why do they think this way?

    To affirm his concerns, you can tell him that this is similar to when a person takes martial arts. The instructor says that these skills are learned to defend oneself, not to attack others unduly. So it is with rhetoric. He learns this to defend his position, ideally defending truth itself, and never to manipulate others or attack them. Rhetoric is persuasion, yes, but eloquent persuasion with truth, goodness, and beauty for the benefit of others as its ultimate aim.

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Concern with Rhetoric

      Hi Catherine,

      While I am not an expert in special needs by any stretch of the imagination, I did want to point out that Ref/Con is specifically working with refuting and confirming fictional stories. It is not asking him to refute or confirm moral ideas or true stories. That is precisely because we want them to practice looking at both sides. When he gets to Common Topic, it will deal with abstract ideas like "honesty". At this point we will not ask him to argue against honesty but only for it.

      I'm not sure if it would be of benefit to explain it to him or not but I thought it would be helpful for you to know that.

      Paul
      Paul Schaeffer
      --
      Director, Schools Division
      Memoria Press

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Concern with Rhetoric

        Originally posted by cherylswope View Post
        Catherine, this is a great question. It reflects not only his challenges in mental flexibility but also, and more importantly, your good work in raising him to love and defend what is true!

        You might try this so as to not trouble his conscience:

        1. He defends a position to the best of his ability.
        2. He then defends the opposing position as strongly and clearly as someone who believed that way would defend that position.
        3. When he finishes the rhetorical exercise, he then tells you (and himself) which is objectively true. Though not part of the rhetorical exercise, you can add this moral exercise to ease his conscience and assure him that we uphold truth no matter how well someone is able to defend it!

        To explain the value of this practice, you can be honest: He will encounter intelligent, albeit errant, thinkers in his young adulthood. He needs to know how they think! It will be an exercise in thinking like those who oppose truth would think. You can tell him that you would not ask a child to do this. He is only being asked to do this because he has the knowledge and maturity to do so. You can assure him you will help. You might listen to newscasts or podcasts you would not normally listen to, just to get his feet wet. What arguments do they make? Why do they think this way?

        To affirm his concerns, you can tell him that this is similar to when a person takes martial arts. The instructor says that these skills are learned to defend oneself, not to attack others unduly. So it is with rhetoric. He learns this to defend his position, ideally defending truth itself, and never to manipulate others or attack them. Rhetoric is persuasion, yes, but eloquent persuasion with truth, goodness, and beauty for the benefit of others as its ultimate aim.
        Cheryl,

        Thank you so much. I shared your response with my son, and he understood the analogy with martial arts. I think he will very much appreciate being able to defend the exercise that he thinks is correct. He has just started to listen to some podcast debates between atheist and Christian thinkers. This will fit in very well!

        I reminded him that a few years ago he was very worried about studying Greek myths for similar reasons. He could barely remember that--"well OF COURSE I know why we read mythology!" So we are definitely coming along here! :-)

        Thanks again!
        Catherine

        2018-19
        DS15, 9th
        DS13, 6th
        DS11, 5th
        DD11, 5th
        DS6, K
        DD3
        DS 10 mos

        Homeschooling 3 with MP
        2 using First Form series in school

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Concern with Rhetoric

          Originally posted by pschaeffer View Post
          Hi Catherine,

          While I am not an expert in special needs by any stretch of the imagination, I did want to point out that Ref/Con is specifically working with refuting and confirming fictional stories. It is not asking him to refute or confirm moral ideas or true stories. That is precisely because we want them to practice looking at both sides. When he gets to Common Topic, it will deal with abstract ideas like "honesty". At this point we will not ask him to argue against honesty but only for it.

          I'm not sure if it would be of benefit to explain it to him or not but I thought it would be helpful for you to know that.

          Paul
          Thank you, Paul! My son was glad to hear this. He is relieved to hear he will not be asked to defend something immoral. His main concern is that in defending a position he believes is incorrect, he is being untruthful. But I think he is beginning to understand why we are doing the exercises. Just still a little uncomfortable with it.

          Thanks again!
          Catherine

          2018-19
          DS15, 9th
          DS13, 6th
          DS11, 5th
          DD11, 5th
          DS6, K
          DD3
          DS 10 mos

          Homeschooling 3 with MP
          2 using First Form series in school

          Comment

          Working...
          X