I officially detest Rod and Staff math. I am not going to do this program. I do not care that it is the one chosen by MP at this point. It is terrible. The instruction is horrible. There is nothing in it that helps me teach at all. We had used MathUSee, and it makes sense to me. My daughter got confused in the middle of Beta. We did Life of Fred Apples (which also made sense to me, but does not teach enough math) for a bit and I bought grade 2 Rod and Staff. The review part is so easy that it is honestly not worth us doing. My daughter can rattle off her addition and subtraction facts. She has no trouble with place value. So I started looking at the first lessons that actually instruct the kids, and the instruction is completely unmeaningful, unclear, unhelpful, and generally just terrible. Now that I have ranted, I want a suggestion of what to do. I am NOT doing R&S. That is no longer on the table. Should I go back to the beginning of MathUSee Beta and just start again, or is there another program I should try? I have heard good things about Teaching Textbooks but I think it is for 3rd grade and above math. I would love to hear from anyone who is not suggesting that I try R&S because I am just not doing that to myself or my kid no matter if every person on the Forum thinks it is the best math program ever.
Announcement
Collapse
Disclaimer  Read This First
Disclaimer
This website contains general information about medical and educational conditions and treatments. The information is not advice, and should not be treated as such.
The educational and medical information on this website is provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied. Cheryl Swope, M.Ed. and Memoria Press make no representations or warranties in relation to the information on this website.
You must not rely on the information on this website as an alternative to medical advice from your doctor or individualized advice from any other professional healthcare or educational provider. If you think you or your child may be suffering from any medical condition you should seek immediate medical attention.
You should never delay seeking medical or educational advice, disregard medical or educational advice, or discontinue medical or educational treatment because of any information on this website.
This website contains general information about medical and educational conditions and treatments. The information is not advice, and should not be treated as such.
The educational and medical information on this website is provided “as is” without any representations or warranties, express or implied. Cheryl Swope, M.Ed. and Memoria Press make no representations or warranties in relation to the information on this website.
You must not rely on the information on this website as an alternative to medical advice from your doctor or individualized advice from any other professional healthcare or educational provider. If you think you or your child may be suffering from any medical condition you should seek immediate medical attention.
You should never delay seeking medical or educational advice, disregard medical or educational advice, or discontinue medical or educational treatment because of any information on this website.
See more
See less
Math other than Rod and Staff
Collapse
X

Re: Math other than Rod and Staff
Hi, Jeje. I noticed that you received plenty of advice on the MP SC Families FB page, so I will only reiterate that you steer your own ship and may certainly select any math program you like. Mrs. Lowe appreciated the mastery approach with systematic review and R&S's nononsense presentation of arithmetic as the foundation for all mathematics. You are free to teach from any math program that accomplishes this for your daughter. If you are still deciding, this recent thread might help. If not, feel free to make a decision & stay with it. If you and your daughter already had steady, measurable success with a different math program, there may be no need to change!

Re: Math other than Rod and Staff
Originally posted by cherylswope View PostHi, Jeje. I noticed that you received plenty of advice on the MP SC Families FB page, so I will only reiterate that you steer your own ship and may certainly select any math program you like. Mrs. Lowe appreciated the mastery approach with systematic review and R&S's nononsense presentation of arithmetic as the foundation for all mathematics. You are free to teach from any math program that accomplishes this for your daughter. If you are still deciding, this recent thread might help. If not, feel free to make a decision & stay with it. If you and your daughter already had steady, measurable success with a different math program, there may be no need to change!JeJe Greer
Mom to:
Stella (6M in 20182019)
Clara (SC3 in 20182019)
Comment

Re: Math other than Rod and Staff
Hi JeJe! My daughter really struggled with carrying and borrowing, too. It’s a difficult concept. Just to put your mind at ease, I do not use Rod and Staff math, either. It is the only swap I make from MP packages. My daughter really struggled in it. I use math mammoth with her, and she really has thrived, but we make modifications. We are going slow, and I always add manipulatives. In math mammoth, they teach the concept of regrouping ones into 10 rods before teaching the notation of regrouping. My daughter and I spent more than a month probably practicing this. I have the units, rods and hundreds for hands on practice. So she would count 10 little units and give them to me in exchange for 1 rod. We did this over and over again, and then I began to teach her what that meant on paper. I am not at my computer at the moment, but I want to link up to the manipulative set that has made all the difference for us I my daughter actually understanding regrouping. I will post again here once I look that up for you. And I’d be happy to post more about how we worked through place value, regrouping and borrowing if you want.Emily J
20182019 School Year
DD (11)MP 5 core
DD (9)SC 4
DD (8)MP 2 core
DS (6)SC B
*Be of good cheer. Do not think of today's failures, but of the success that may come tomorrow. You have set yourself a difficult task but you will succeed if you persevere: and you will find joy in overcoming obstacles. Remember, no effort that we make to obtain something beautiful is ever lost. ~Helen Keller*
Comment

Re: Math other than Rod and Staff
This manipulative set has seen a lot of use for us: https://www.amazon.com/LearningReso.../dp/B000F8VBBOEmily J
20182019 School Year
DD (11)MP 5 core
DD (9)SC 4
DD (8)MP 2 core
DS (6)SC B
*Be of good cheer. Do not think of today's failures, but of the success that may come tomorrow. You have set yourself a difficult task but you will succeed if you persevere: and you will find joy in overcoming obstacles. Remember, no effort that we make to obtain something beautiful is ever lost. ~Helen Keller*
Comment

Re: Math other than Rod and Staff
Originally posted by EmilyJ View PostHi JeJe! My daughter really struggled with carrying and borrowing, too. It’s a difficult concept. Just to put your mind at ease, I do not use Rod and Staff math, either. It is the only swap I make from MP packages. My daughter really struggled in it. I use math mammoth with her, and she really has thrived, but we make modifications. We are going slow, and I always add manipulatives. In math mammoth, they teach the concept of regrouping ones into 10 rods before teaching the notation of regrouping. My daughter and I spent more than a month probably practicing this. I have the units, rods and hundreds for hands on practice. So she would count 10 little units and give them to me in exchange for 1 rod. We did this over and over again, and then I began to teach her what that meant on paper. I am not at my computer at the moment, but I want to link up to the manipulative set that has made all the difference for us I my daughter actually understanding regrouping. I will post again here once I look that up for you. And I’d be happy to post more about how we worked through place value, regrouping and borrowing if you want.JeJe Greer
Mom to:
Stella (6M in 20182019)
Clara (SC3 in 20182019)
Comment

Re: Math other than Rod and Staff
Originally posted by EmilyJ View PostThis manipulative set has seen a lot of use for us: https://www.amazon.com/LearningReso.../dp/B000F8VBBOJeJe Greer
Mom to:
Stella (6M in 20182019)
Clara (SC3 in 20182019)
Comment

Re: Math other than Rod and Staff
Honestly, we didn’t really use the booklet much. I had my daughter regrouping without paper first, then I would give her a number and have her build it with the blocks, and I had this poster I made with spaces for the place values: she would have to put the correct blocks in each box. So, at the top, I put hundred, tens, ones (using pictures of the blocks and words) and then a space to build the number at the bottom. Eventually I used that chart to help her understand what would happen when we regrouped. So, for example, she builds 27 using the blocks and the chart: she puts 2 ten rods in the tens box and 7 unit cubes in the ones box. Then we work through what happens when we add 1 unit cube at a time...when we get to 10 unit cubes, she knows what to do, exchange for a ten rod, and then we look at the new number. We did that for a while, then started writing the numbers and then the notation of adding a little 1 in math problems, but always using the blocks too until I knew she had it.Emily J
20182019 School Year
DD (11)MP 5 core
DD (9)SC 4
DD (8)MP 2 core
DS (6)SC B
*Be of good cheer. Do not think of today's failures, but of the success that may come tomorrow. You have set yourself a difficult task but you will succeed if you persevere: and you will find joy in overcoming obstacles. Remember, no effort that we make to obtain something beautiful is ever lost. ~Helen Keller*
Comment

Re: Math other than Rod and Staff
Originally posted by EmilyJ View PostHonestly, we didn’t really use the booklet much. I had my daughter regrouping without paper first, then I would give her a number and have her build it with the blocks, and I had this poster I made with spaces for the place values: she would have to put the correct blocks in each box. So, at the top, I put hundred, tens, ones (using pictures of the blocks and words) and then a space to build the number at the bottom. Eventually I used that chart to help her understand what would happen when we regrouped. So, for example, she builds 27 using the blocks and the chart: she puts 2 ten rods in the tens box and 7 unit cubes in the ones box. Then we work through what happens when we add 1 unit cube at a time...when we get to 10 unit cubes, she knows what to do, exchange for a ten rod, and then we look at the new number. We did that for a while, then started writing the numbers and then the notation of adding a little 1 in math problems, but always using the blocks too until I knew she had it.JeJe Greer
Mom to:
Stella (6M in 20182019)
Clara (SC3 in 20182019)
Comment

Re: Math other than Rod and Staff
Yes, base ten blocks were a life saver for us. We had a wooden set that included the hundred cube. I needed the set for my daughter for several years! We used base ten blocks to illustrate both multidigit addition and subtraction. We should add these to our optional supply list.
Thanks, Emily & JeJe!
Comment
Comment