I am hoping someone can help me understand the nuts'n'bolts of teaching cursive before (or in place of) manuscript, while also teaching phonics.
Both my eight and eleven year old boys experience manuscript reversals and other printing struggles. I intend to switch the eleven year old to cursive (I think his manuscript has plataued due partially to having Aspergers), but I feel like I should not switch the eight year old until his manuscript is neat - I feel he needs to master it before moving on.
With the next three children I'd like to just *skip* the many problems we've had with manuscript all together, and begin with cursive.
I've heard many advocate "cursive first", but how does this really work with learning phonics/reading at the same time?
With the exception of Blend-Phonics, and similarly Don Potter's explanation of using Alpha-Phonics in cursive on a board, every phonics program I have seen is in manuscript. The physical books and readers are in manuscript, and many include some form of copywork, also in manuscript.
For kindergarten, could I use New American Cursive for writing, and First Start Reading for phonics? What are the nuts'n'bolts of this, as First Start Reading has quite a bit of manuscript practice in it?
I could even see using something like First Start Reading and simply using the manuscript copywork to help reinforce the lessons. But after that, once the child is reading, do you wait for their manuscript to be neat before moving into cursive? Or do you dive into cursive even if their manuscript is horrible?
Alternatively, if I took the (considerable!) time to print up a vintage primer or phonics program in cursive, and made all the needed copywork also in cursive... do children easily connect the cursive they've learned, with the manuscript everywhere around them? (Books, street signs, cereal boxes, etc.)
I hope my questions make sense. Thankfully I have a year or two left to figure this out - my "next student" is only four years old.
Thank you for any insights.
Both my eight and eleven year old boys experience manuscript reversals and other printing struggles. I intend to switch the eleven year old to cursive (I think his manuscript has plataued due partially to having Aspergers), but I feel like I should not switch the eight year old until his manuscript is neat - I feel he needs to master it before moving on.
With the next three children I'd like to just *skip* the many problems we've had with manuscript all together, and begin with cursive.
I've heard many advocate "cursive first", but how does this really work with learning phonics/reading at the same time?
With the exception of Blend-Phonics, and similarly Don Potter's explanation of using Alpha-Phonics in cursive on a board, every phonics program I have seen is in manuscript. The physical books and readers are in manuscript, and many include some form of copywork, also in manuscript.
For kindergarten, could I use New American Cursive for writing, and First Start Reading for phonics? What are the nuts'n'bolts of this, as First Start Reading has quite a bit of manuscript practice in it?
I could even see using something like First Start Reading and simply using the manuscript copywork to help reinforce the lessons. But after that, once the child is reading, do you wait for their manuscript to be neat before moving into cursive? Or do you dive into cursive even if their manuscript is horrible?
Alternatively, if I took the (considerable!) time to print up a vintage primer or phonics program in cursive, and made all the needed copywork also in cursive... do children easily connect the cursive they've learned, with the manuscript everywhere around them? (Books, street signs, cereal boxes, etc.)
I hope my questions make sense. Thankfully I have a year or two left to figure this out - my "next student" is only four years old.

Thank you for any insights.
Comment