This is my third year now teaching Traditional Spelling, and I love it! I taught TS1 two years ago, TS2 last year, and am teaching TS2 again this year to a new group of students. I feel like I having finally learned how to teach phonics, and finally understand the benefit that the traditional approach has for both reading and spelling, for all kinds of students--those for whom spelling and reading are intuitive, and those for whom they are not. (Confession--I was professionally trained in the disastrous "whole language" approach to reading and then began my homeschooling career with an "unschooling" mindset...only to find myself putting my four older kids in a classical online academy in middle school and then basically starting a private school for my youngest! Talk about a 180.
)
Anyway, I love TS, and I love the foundation it has provided my students who have gone through two years of the program.
My question is, what is the spelling philosophy after 2nd grade? What's the purpose, and what is the goal?
We have begun a 3rd/4th combo class and are using Spelling Workout D, and honestly, my teacher is not loving it. The lessons are not nearly as well-developed as TS, so she's kind of winging it. As we talked about it this week, here are the questions we had--
1. Is it assumed that by 3rd grade and after two years of TS, students have completed their need for systematic phonics instruction? is this why there is little instruction included with Spelling Workout? Should we assume that phonics now gives way to literature? And if so, IS there a role for phonics instruction at this level? What is the goal of spelling instruction for students who have successfully completed TS 1 & 2? Is it just to review those basic phonological patterns? To practice the habit of committing words to memory?
2. For students who struggle with spelling (likely with mild to moderate dyslexia) the cursory approach of Spelling Workout seems inadequate, and yet they have already completed TS. What ought to be done for students like these in 3rd and 4th grade? Is there anything else that might be a better approach for struggling spellers?
Thank you for your feedback!
Shawna

Anyway, I love TS, and I love the foundation it has provided my students who have gone through two years of the program.
My question is, what is the spelling philosophy after 2nd grade? What's the purpose, and what is the goal?
We have begun a 3rd/4th combo class and are using Spelling Workout D, and honestly, my teacher is not loving it. The lessons are not nearly as well-developed as TS, so she's kind of winging it. As we talked about it this week, here are the questions we had--
1. Is it assumed that by 3rd grade and after two years of TS, students have completed their need for systematic phonics instruction? is this why there is little instruction included with Spelling Workout? Should we assume that phonics now gives way to literature? And if so, IS there a role for phonics instruction at this level? What is the goal of spelling instruction for students who have successfully completed TS 1 & 2? Is it just to review those basic phonological patterns? To practice the habit of committing words to memory?
2. For students who struggle with spelling (likely with mild to moderate dyslexia) the cursory approach of Spelling Workout seems inadequate, and yet they have already completed TS. What ought to be done for students like these in 3rd and 4th grade? Is there anything else that might be a better approach for struggling spellers?
Thank you for your feedback!
Shawna
Comment