I feel like I'm re-learning how to teach math, and for the first time starting to recognize what true "mastery" of arithmetic is. I've seen and used so many curriculums that proport to be mastery-based, but I find that most actually are not, at least not without a lot of supplementation.
I'm now looking at the R&S 2 and 3 curriculum that is sitting in front of me that I plan to use with my small class of 5 2nd-graders and 2 3rd-graders. It is seeming blessedly simple. However, I do think that my 5 rising 2nd graders have pretty much covered most of the content, and could most likely do R&S 3 along with the 3rd graders.
My question: just because a child can move through arithmetic at a more accelerated paced, should they? Or, is there wisdom in repetition and doing math until it is so easy it is automatic?
Old me would have said yes...accelerate, accelerate, accelerate. But now I'm thinking maybe there is wisdom in repetition? Of math actually feeling a little "easy" and "familiar"?
So, any opinions? Should I put my 2nd graders through another year of content that we have basically already covered? Or, do I push them ahead because the can do more?
I'm now looking at the R&S 2 and 3 curriculum that is sitting in front of me that I plan to use with my small class of 5 2nd-graders and 2 3rd-graders. It is seeming blessedly simple. However, I do think that my 5 rising 2nd graders have pretty much covered most of the content, and could most likely do R&S 3 along with the 3rd graders.
My question: just because a child can move through arithmetic at a more accelerated paced, should they? Or, is there wisdom in repetition and doing math until it is so easy it is automatic?
Old me would have said yes...accelerate, accelerate, accelerate. But now I'm thinking maybe there is wisdom in repetition? Of math actually feeling a little "easy" and "familiar"?
So, any opinions? Should I put my 2nd graders through another year of content that we have basically already covered? Or, do I push them ahead because the can do more?
Comment