Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question about "Protagora's Dilemma" in The Classical Teacher

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Question about "Protagora's Dilemma" in The Classical Teacher

    I can't tell you how much we all enjoyed this article! It's a great story in itself. I have one question, though, as someone knowing nothing (yet!) of formal logic. Why is it necessary, in the counter-dilemma, to switch P and R? Why wouldn't the argument work by still keeping P as the first part of the counter-dilemma?

    But how did it end?? Personally, I think Protagoras still has the stronger argument: Euathlus's case seems to rest on his choosing when he will obey the judge and when not. This is actually very interesting: is a private, pre-existing agreement stronger than a court decision? Morally, but not legally? Only when it's to my advantage? Good things to think about.

    Thank you for putting up with my ignorance!
    DS (14) and DD (13): MPOA and MP, mostly 8th grade
    DS (6): a mix of K resources, MP and not
Working...
X