I apologize if this has been answered or explained somewhere else. This is my first time going through Logic with one of my children, so in the process of learning a lot.
On Ch 6 quiz of Trad. Logic II.
In the Second section #2: Why is it not a 1st order Enthymeme (missing major premise)?
On the key - the premise added is "All things undermined by scientific inquiry are things undermined by exploring the efficient causes of the natural world. "
- Is this not adding the major premise?
Premises stated in question:
The Bible is not undermined by scientific inquiry because (conclusion)
exploring the efficient causes of the natural world does not undermine the Bible. (minor premise)
Bible= minor term
Scientific inquiry= major term
exploring efficient causes of natural world= middle term (not conclusion)
Thank you for your help,
Laura Smith​
On Ch 6 quiz of Trad. Logic II.
In the Second section #2: Why is it not a 1st order Enthymeme (missing major premise)?
On the key - the premise added is "All things undermined by scientific inquiry are things undermined by exploring the efficient causes of the natural world. "
- Is this not adding the major premise?
Premises stated in question:
The Bible is not undermined by scientific inquiry because (conclusion)
exploring the efficient causes of the natural world does not undermine the Bible. (minor premise)
Bible= minor term
Scientific inquiry= major term
exploring efficient causes of natural world= middle term (not conclusion)
Thank you for your help,
Laura Smith​
Comment