Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Traditional Logic II Ch. 13

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Traditional Logic II Ch. 13

    Hello again,

    For #47 (Ch13 Day 4) the conclusion should read "not unnecessary" instead of "not necessary".

    And I'm not sure if you are aware that the diagram on page 87 of the text is incorrect under 'The Original'. It shows the antecedents moving and negated instead of consequents for a complex constructive dilemma. The' Is Changed To' is correct.
    Courtney
    Mom to 5 boys-14,13,10,8,5 and the girls- 3 and 1

    #2
    Re: Traditional Logic II Ch. 13

    Originally posted by Courtney View Post
    Hello again,

    For #47 (Ch13 Day 4) the conclusion should read "not unnecessary" instead of "not necessary".

    And I'm not sure if you are aware that the diagram on page 87 of the text is incorrect under 'The Original'. It shows the antecedents moving and negated instead of consequents for a complex constructive dilemma. The' Is Changed To' is correct.
    Thank you!
    Michael
    Memoria Press

    Comment

    Working...
    X