Traditional Logic II Ch. 13

[Courtney]

Hello again,

For #47 (Ch13 Day 4) the conclusion should read "not unnecessary" instead of "not necessary".

And I'm not sure if you are aware that the diagram on page 87 of the text is incorrect under 'The Original'. It shows the antecedents moving and negated instead of consequents for a complex constructive dilemma. The' Is Changed To' is correct.

[Michael]

Re: Traditional Logic II Ch. 13

Hello again,

For #47 (Ch13 Day 4) the conclusion should read "not unnecessary" instead of "not necessary".

And I'm not sure if you are aware that the diagram on page 87 of the text is incorrect under 'The Original'. It shows the antecedents moving and negated instead of consequents for a complex constructive dilemma. The' Is Changed To' is correct.

Thank you!